JEM News
Welcome to Your New Job... But Don't Fall in Love
With the Neighborhood Just Yet!
posted 2009
In the waning weeks of each college
football season, as conference championships heat up, bowl directors make up
their wish lists of teams that would be the best draw and the talk begins about
who will play in the BCS title game, there are just as many programs passing out the
pink slips. Whether it was too many losses, the need to head in a "new
direction" or they couldn't beat their hated rival, there are almost as many
programs putting coaches in the unemployment line as there are ones heading for
warm weather bowl destinations. Such is life in major college football.
Last year alone 20 schools replaced their head man.
Some retired such as Mike Bellotti (Ore.) and Joe Tiller (Purdue) and some moved
on to bigger programs and more lucrative contracts such as Gene Chizik (ISU-AU)
and Brady Hoke (BSU-SDSU) but most were unceremoniously canned. At times this
could work out well. Nick Saben took Alabama to a bowl win in his first season,
finished 12-2 last year and was one quarter of football away from playing for
the BCS championship. Although it was mostly a lateral move, Houston Nutt took
over a 3-9 Mississippi team and turned it around to finish 9-4 including huge
wins over Florida and Texas Tech. Brian Kelly took over an average Cincinnati
program that finished 19-17 the three previous years under Mark Dantonio and has
compiled a 21-4 record the last 2 years including a Big East title and BCS bowl
game.
However, more often than not, the first couple of
years under a new regime can prove difficult especially if new schemes are
being introduced on either side of the ball. One of the most glaring examples of
this was the Michigan situation last year under first year coach Rich Rodriguez.
Trying to implement a new spread offense into a program long known for its
power rushing attack proved more arduous than most anticipated and resulted in a
3-9 record, the first losing season in 40 years for the Wolverines. Bill
Callahan experienced the same frustrations in Lincoln where the transformation
to a wide open attack yielded seasons of 5-6, 8-4, 9-5 and 5-7 before he was
fired. Even if a new coach is not introducing dramatic change, adjustment to a
new staff can be difficult. I'm sure most fans in Louisville did not envision a
11-13 record the last two years under Steve Kragthorpe after a combined 41-9
record under Bobby Patrino. Although Steve Kragthorp did a remarkable job
turning around Tulsa, it is clearly taking a little longer than expected getting
the Cardinals back to the top of the Big East.
Unfortunately time is the one thing most
athletic directors and alumni are not willing to provide. Lucrative
contracts?...Sure, how would you like that deposited? Stadium renovations and
upgraded facilities to wow new recruits?... No problem, when would you like us
to break ground? But ask for some patience and your likely response will be...
sorry we're fresh out of that one. Out of the 120 head coaches in the FBS,
exactly half are in their first 3 years with their program. In fact, job
security does not appear to be an option until you reach your ninth season as
you could see in the table below.
| Number of years with team |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10+ |
| Number of coaches |
20 |
19 |
21 |
7 |
15 |
5 |
3 |
5 |
12 |
13 |
How this years class of freshman head coaches will
fare, only time will tell. As we mentioned earlier there are 20 new head coaches
scattered across the conferences heading into the '09 season. What most consider
the toughest, the SEC, has three. Two of them, Lane Kiffin at Tennessee and Gene
Chizik at Auburn will need early success while expectations for Dan Mullen at
Mississippi St. will not be as high. Even though the Big XII has two 1st year
coaches, only Paul Rhoads at Iowa St. qualifies as calling Bill Snyder a new
coach at Kansas St. is like calling Brett Favre a rookie in the NFC North.
The conference with the most turnover is the MAC as 5 of the 13 schools
introduce new staffs. Brady Hoke was rewarded for his accomplishments at Ball
St. with the head spot at SDSU. Toledo said goodbye to Tom Amstutz after 30
years of service when he resigned and former Notre Dame OC Mike Haywood becomes
the next in line at the "cradle of coaches", Miami (OH). The Pac 10 has two new
faces. Steve Sarkisian heads north from USC to Seattle and will try to return
the Huskies to the top and Chip Kelly will try to follow the footsteps of Mike
Bellotti who won 116 of 171 games in Eugene. The transition should be a little
easier for Chip Kelly as well as Danny Hope (Purdue), Frank Spaziani (Boston
College) and Stan Parrish (Ball St.) as all four of these coaches were hired
from within. There appears to be less shock to the system when schools choose
this course. Bret Bielema was 12-1 SU and 9-3 ATS following the legendary Barry
Alverez at Wisconsin. Chris Peterson was Boise St's OC when he replaced Dan
Hawkins and has posted a 35-4 SU record since '06. I'm sure hearts were broken
in Utah when Urban Meyer left the Utes for the "swamp" in Florida. But their DC,
Kyle Wittingham, was given the job and has followed the "Urban legend" nicely with
a 37-14 SU record including last years undefeated season and #2 final ranking.
It is always interesting following new coaches
and watching their programs mature and improve. Hopefully this year's freshmen
class of coaches will see that improvement at years end and not the dreaded
pink slip...!
Home Field....Advantage?
posted 2008
There is nothing quite like an
autumn Saturday. The leaves are falling, the air is fresh and from big cities to
small towns across America the sound of drums from university marching bands can
be heard. From Doak S. Campbell Stadium in Tallahassee to the Coliseum in Los
Angeles, from Tiger Stadium in Baton Rouge to Michigan Stadium in Ann Arbor,
millions of rabid football fans are doing there best to cheer, scream, shout and
yes will there team to victory. Visiting teams must feel like they're being fed to the
lions. Audibles at the line can't be heard, the student sections are pounding
their feet doing the "Tomahawk", the "Gator Chomp", or singing "Rocky Top" for
what seems like an eternity. Every mistake and negative play is shown over and
over on the jumbotron. So we ask, how much of an impact does home field
advantage have not only on the outcome of the game but, more
importantly for a handicapper, on the point spread.
We decided to break down our data in the table
below by conference with each conference's overall home winning percentage
and overall home ATS winning percentage. All records
are from the 2000 through 2007. A team must have played at least 5 seasons of IA
ball to be counted. As you would expect most of your "power" conferences
dominate the home winning percentage category. Now take a look at the home ATS
winning percentages. Are you surprised to see the Big East (1), WAC (2) and MAC
(T4) all ranked in the top 5? What if we told you, excluding the three
Independent teams, that the ACC (10) and the SEC (11) round out the bottom of
the list! Scratching your head yet?
| Conference |
Home Win % |
Rank |
Conference |
Home ATS % |
Rank |
| BIG 12 |
70 |
1 |
Big East |
57.6 |
1 |
| BIG 10 |
67.7 |
2 |
WAC |
56.2 |
2 |
| SEC |
67.6 |
3 |
BIG 12 |
53.7 |
3 |
| Big East |
67.5 |
4 |
MAC |
52.3 |
T4 |
| ACC |
66 |
5 |
BIG 10 |
52.3 |
T4 |
| WAC |
65.2 |
6 |
Sun Belt |
51.6 |
6 |
| PAC 10 |
63.2 |
7 |
Mountain West |
50.9 |
7 |
| Mountain West |
60.8 |
8 |
PAC 10 |
50.8 |
8 |
| CUSA |
57.4 |
9 |
CUSA |
49.8 |
9 |
| Sun Belt |
56.8 |
10 |
ACC |
47.9 |
10 |
| MAC |
55.2 |
11 |
SEC |
46.9 |
11 |
| Independent |
46.3 |
12 |
Independent |
39.5 |
12 |
Let's start our analysis with what
many consider the best in college football, the SEC. These fans are hard core.
Stadium capacities average over 83,000 and are almost always sold out. The noise
levels are deafening and the environments are hostile. The home teams in this
conference must dominate! Well, yes and no. The only teams that had a won / loss
record below .500 were Mississippi St, Vanderbilt and Kentucky, no surprise
there. But how about the fact there were only 4 teams in this conference with a
winning ATS record at home over that span and two of them were Mississippi (+1)
and Kentucky (+3).You would think if your team was going into places like
Tuscaloosa AL, Knoxville TN, and Athens GA, it would be prudent to keep your
money in your wallet and your wallet in your pocket. In reality, if you look at
the ATS home record for those teams the odds would be in
your favor! This pattern follows many of the high profile programs in the
country. We list each table below according to their overall home ATS winning %.
| BIG EAST |
HOME ATS |
% |
HOME WIN / LOSS |
% |
| Connecticut |
24 - 13 |
64.9 |
30 - 19 |
61.2 |
| South Florida |
20 - 11 |
64.5 |
39 - 9 |
81.3 |
| Syracuse |
30 - 17 |
63.8 |
27 - 22 |
55.1 |
| Cincinnati |
26 - 17 |
60.5 |
33 - 14 |
70 |
| Louisville |
27 - 18 |
60 |
41 - 7 |
85.4 |
| Rutgers |
24 - 20 |
54.5 |
25 - 26 |
49 |
| Pittsburgh |
23 - 23 |
50 |
34 - 17 |
66.7 |
| West Virginia |
22 - 25 |
46.8 |
37 - 14 |
72.5 |
| Overall |
196 - 144 |
57.6 |
266 - 128 |
67.5 |
| WAC |
HOME ATS |
% |
HOME WIN / LOSS |
% |
| Boise St |
30 - 13 |
69.8 |
48 - 1 |
98 |
| San Jose St |
22 - 11 |
66.7 |
24 - 16 |
60 |
| Nevada |
28 - 15 |
65.1 |
29 - 17 |
63 |
| Hawaii |
32- 22 |
59.3 |
46 - 15 |
75.4 |
| Louisiana Tech |
19 - 15 |
55.9 |
24 - 14 |
63.2 |
| New Mexico St |
20 - 18 |
52.6 |
22 - 22 |
50 |
| Fresno St |
18 - 22 |
45 |
37 - 9 |
80 |
| Utah St |
15 - 19 |
44.1 |
17 - 22 |
43.6 |
| Idaho |
12 - 18 |
40 |
13 - 23 |
36.1 |
| Overall |
196 - 153 |
56.2 |
260 - 139 |
65.2 |
| BIG XII |
HOME ATS |
% |
HOME WIN / LOSS |
% |
| Texas Tech |
26 - 17 |
60.5 |
40 - 10 |
80 |
| Oklahoma St |
25 - 17 |
59.5 |
31 - 19 |
62 |
| Kansas St |
29 - 20 |
59.2 |
41 - 15 |
73.2 |
| Texas |
27 - 19 |
58.7 |
43 - 4 |
91.5 |
| Missouri |
25 - 19 |
56.8 |
33 - 17 |
66 |
| Texas A&M |
26 - 20 |
56.5 |
35 - 17 |
67.3 |
| Oklahoma |
26 - 24 |
52 |
49 - 2 |
96.1 |
| Nebraska |
27 - 25 |
51.9 |
45 - 11 |
80.4 |
| Iowa St |
23 - 22 |
51.1 |
32 - 20 |
61.5 |
| Kansas |
23 - 22 |
51.1 |
32 - 20 |
61.5 |
| Colorado |
22 - 24 |
47.8 |
28 - 19 |
59.6 |
| Baylor |
16 - 25 |
39 |
20 - 30 |
40 |
| Overall |
295 - 254 |
53.7 |
429 - 184 |
70 |
| MAC |
HOME ATS |
% |
HOME WIN / LOSS |
% |
| Toledo |
28 - 12 |
70 |
42 - 6 |
87.5 |
| Ball St |
20 - 14 |
58.8 |
19 - 22 |
46.3 |
| Central Michigan |
20 - 15 |
57.1 |
22 - 20 |
52.4 |
| Ohio |
20 - 16 |
55.6 |
22 - 20 |
52.4 |
| Miami OH |
21 - 17 |
55.3 |
26 - 13 |
66.7 |
| Buffalo |
21 - 18 |
53.8 |
11 - 31 |
26.2 |
| Bowling Green |
18 - 16 |
52.9 |
30 - 11 |
73.2 |
| Northern Illinois |
20 - 18 |
52.6 |
33 - 12 |
73.3 |
| Temple |
22 - 20 |
52.4 |
13 - 32 |
28.9 |
| Eastern Michigan |
15 - 17 |
46.9 |
17 - 24 |
41.5 |
| Akron |
17 - 20 |
45.9 |
26 - 14 |
65 |
| Western Michigan |
14 - 21 |
40 |
26 - 17 |
60.5 |
| Kent St |
12 - 22 |
35.3 |
17 - 25 |
40.5 |
| Overall |
248 - 226 |
52.3 |
304 - 247 |
55.2 |
| SUN BELT |
HOME ATS |
% |
HOME WIN / LOSS |
% |
| Arkansas St |
20 - 15 |
57.1 |
26 - 17 |
60.5 |
| North Texas |
21 - 16 |
56.8 |
22 - 18 |
55 |
| Troy |
12 - 10 |
54.5 |
32 - 6 |
84.2 |
| Mid Tenn St |
17 - 17 |
50 |
25 - 15 |
62.5 |
| LA Monroe |
13 - 15 |
46.4 |
15 - 24 |
38.5 |
| LA Lafayette |
13 - 17 |
43.3 |
18 - 25 |
41.9 |
| Overall |
96 - 90 |
51.6 |
138 - 105 |
56.8 |
| MOUNTAIN WEST |
HOME ATS |
% |
HOME WIN / LOSS |
% |
| TCU |
27 - 16 |
62.8 |
39 - 6 |
86.7 |
| New Mexico |
23 - 19 |
54.8 |
30 - 18 |
62.5 |
| Utah |
24 - 20 |
54.5 |
33 - 13 |
71.7 |
| BYU |
24 - 22 |
52.2 |
33 - 15 |
68.8 |
| Wyoming |
20 - 19 |
51.3 |
22 - 23 |
48.9 |
| Air Force |
21 - 23 |
47.7 |
31 - 18 |
63.3 |
| San Diego St |
18 - 21 |
46.2 |
19 - 26 |
42.2 |
| UNLV |
19 - 23 |
45 |
17 - 27 |
38.6 |
| Colorado St |
16 - 22 |
42 |
27 - 16 |
62.8 |
| Overall |
192 - 185 |
50.9 |
251 - 162 |
60.8 |
| PAC TEN |
HOME ATS |
% |
HOME WIN / LOSS |
% |
| Oregon St |
26 - 15 |
63.4 |
38 - 11 |
77.6 |
| Arizona St |
30 - 19 |
61.2 |
37 - 16 |
69.8 |
| UCLA |
27 - 18 |
60 |
35 - 14 |
71.4 |
| Oregon |
26 - 22 |
54.2 |
39 - 12 |
76.5 |
| Stanford |
24 - 23 |
51.1 |
19 - 29 |
39.6 |
| USC |
25 - 24 |
51 |
41 - 8 |
83.7 |
| California |
21 - 25 |
45.7 |
30 - 18 |
62.5 |
| Washington St |
19 - 23 |
45.2 |
25 - 20 |
55.6 |
| Washington |
20 - 30 |
40 |
29 - 22 |
56.9 |
| Arizona |
17 - 29 |
37 |
20 - 32 |
38.5 |
| Overall |
235 - 228 |
50.8 |
313 - 182 |
63.2 |
| CUSA |
HOME ATS |
% |
HOME WIN / LOSS |
% |
| Rice |
24 - 14 |
63.2 |
20 - 20 |
50 |
| Marshall |
20 - 16 |
55.6 |
36 - 10 |
78.3 |
| UCF |
19 - 18 |
51.4 |
27 - 17 |
61.4 |
| Tulsa |
21 - 21 |
50 |
27 - 20 |
57.4 |
| UAB |
19 - 19 |
50 |
25 - 18 |
58.1 |
| Tulane |
18 - 18 |
50 |
23 - 17 |
57.5 |
| Memphis |
21 - 22 |
48.8 |
27 - 23 |
54 |
| East Carolina |
21 - 22 |
48.8 |
22 - 22 |
50 |
| UTEP |
19 - 20 |
48.7 |
26 - 20 |
56.5 |
| SMU |
21 - 25 |
45.7 |
19 - 28 |
40.4 |
| So. Mississippi |
17 - 21 |
44.8 |
30 - 13 |
69.8 |
| Houston |
19 - 25 |
43.2 |
26 - 21 |
55.3 |
| Overall |
239 - 241 |
49.8 |
308 - 229 |
57.4 |
| ACC |
HOME ATS |
% |
HOME WIN / LOSS |
% |
| Virginia |
31 - 17 |
64.6 |
38 - 12 |
76 |
| Boston College |
28 - 16 |
63.6 |
40 - 10 |
80 |
| Virginia Tech |
29 - 22 |
56.9 |
46 - 9 |
83.6 |
| Maryland |
24 - 21 |
53.3 |
37 - 13 |
74 |
| Clemson |
23 - 25 |
47.9 |
39 - 14 |
73.6 |
| Georgia Tech |
21 - 25 |
45.7 |
33 - 17 |
66 |
| Wake Forest |
19 - 23 |
45.2 |
25 - 24 |
51 |
| Florida St |
21 - 26 |
44.7 |
38 - 11 |
77.6 |
| North Carolina |
20 - 26 |
43.5 |
23 - 26 |
46.9 |
| Miami Fla |
20 - 29 |
40.8 |
42 - 9 |
82.4 |
| NC State |
16 - 30 |
34.8 |
32 - 21 |
60.4 |
| Duke |
14 - 29 |
32.6 |
7 - 40 |
14.9 |
| Overall |
266 - 289 |
47.9 |
400 - 206 |
66 |
| SEC |
HOME ATS |
% |
HOME WIN / LOSS |
% |
| Florida |
26 - 22 |
54.2 |
43 - 8 |
84.3 |
| Auburn |
28 - 24 |
53.8 |
47 - 10 |
82.5 |
| Kentucky |
25 - 22 |
53.2 |
25 - 28 |
47.2 |
| Mississippi |
24 - 23 |
51.1 |
31 - 22 |
58.5 |
| LSU |
26 - 26 |
50 |
49 - 7 |
87.5 |
| Arkansas |
26 - 27 |
49.1 |
41 - 17 |
70.7 |
| Georgia |
21 - 24 |
46.7 |
43 - 8 |
84.3 |
| South Carolina |
23 - 27 |
46 |
34 - 20 |
63 |
| Tennessee |
23 - 31 |
42.6 |
41 - 13 |
75.9 |
| Vanderbilt |
17 - 24 |
41.5 |
16 - 35 |
31.4 |
| Mississippi St |
17 - 28 |
37.8 |
21 - 29 |
42 |
| Alabama |
19 - 33 |
36.5 |
36 - 21 |
63.2 |
| Overall |
275 - 311 |
46.9 |
427 - 205 |
67.6 |
| BIG TEN |
HOME ATS |
% |
HOME WIN / LOSS |
% |
| Iowa |
32 - 16 |
66.7 |
39 - 12 |
76.5 |
| Ohio St |
31 - 22 |
58.5 |
48 - 7 |
87.3 |
| Penn St |
30 - 22 |
57.7 |
39 - 15 |
72.2 |
| Purdue |
26 - 21 |
55.3 |
37 - 15 |
71.2 |
| Minnesota |
25 - 21 |
54.3 |
32 - 19 |
62.7 |
| Michigan |
27 - 25 |
51.9 |
46 - 8 |
85.2 |
| Wisconsin |
25 - 26 |
49 |
41 - 14 |
74.5 |
| Northwestern |
22 - 24 |
47.8 |
26 - 22 |
54.2 |
| Illinois |
22 - 24 |
47.8 |
25 - 25 |
50 |
| Indiana |
21 - 23 |
47.7 |
24 - 25 |
49 |
| Michigan St |
19 - 31 |
38 |
30 - 23 |
56.6 |
| Overall |
275 - 311 |
46.9 |
427 - 205 |
67.6 |
| iNDEPENDENTS |
HOME ATS |
% |
HOME WIN / LOSS |
% |
| Notre Dame |
22 - 28 |
44 |
31 - 19 |
62 |
| Navy |
14 - 22 |
38.9 |
21 - 22 |
48.8 |
| Army |
13 - 25 |
34.2 |
11 - 32 |
25.6 |
| Overall |
49 - 75 |
39.5 |
63 - 73 |
46.3 |
It seems most teams do win more often than
not at home and some teams win just about every time. But when it comes to the
point spread, which in a way measures how well a team is expected to perform,
the answer to our "home field advantage" question becomes less clear. What can
be some of the reasons for this? Today it's common to hear coaches say they
prefer to take their team on the road. Certainly there are less distractions
away from home. The team stays together at a hotel and the pregame routine can
be more easily controlled and regimented. Many coaches will cultivate the "us
vs. the world" mentality and if a team is going into places like Tennessee ,
Miami or Clemson as a heavy dog it's easy to feel "disrespected". All of this
can bring a team closer, make them more focused and ultimately more dangerous.
Teams like Toledo, TCU, Rice and San Jose St don't exactly roll off the lips
when your talking about teams that are some of the best in the country covering
at home. If you look at the tables above, it does seem that the oddsmakers tend
to undervalue them on their own turf.
The discussion over home field advantage will continue from the
"sports experts" on TV and radio to the water cooler at work. The intent of this
article was not to provide a definitive answer. Instead, we wanted to point out
that if you do believe in home field advantage maybe it doesn't exist for the
teams you thought. If you don't believe in it, maybe it does exist for the teams you
would least expect!
2007 NCAA football season in review...
WOW!...We think that pretty much sums up what was the
most exciting, exhilarating and unpredictable seasons in college football
history. From the casual fan's point of view you couldn't ask for more. From
the Appalachian St upset of Michigan to Stanford's conquest of USC.
From Colorado kicking their way past Oklahoma to South Florida rising to #2 in
the nation only to lose 4 of their last 7. Illinois knocking off undefeated Ohio
St, Hawaii going 12-1 and Notre Dame going 3-9. From Pittsburgh
spoiling the title hopes of West Virginia to Kansas and Kentucky shocking their
conferences. Only in a season like that could a team with 2 losses in LSU win a
National Title, a first in college football history!
From a handicapper's point of view, speaking for ourselves, it was a
little frustrating. Many of our picks suffered from an inordinate amount of back
door covers and a high amount of turnovers. For example, of the 82 games we
picked our teams finished -3 or more in the turnover margin in 11 of those.
Going into those 11 games our team had a substantial turnover
advantage in 7 of them...that hurt! We
failed to win or push a game by 7 points or less 9 times and failed to win or
push a game by 3 points or less 12 times. The close ones certainly didn't go our
way in '07. With all of that being said, we were remarkably able to finish
the regular season at 41-41 and a ranking of 68 out of 107 of some of the top
handicappers in the country according to The Sports Monitor of Oklahoma. The
bowl season didn't fair much better. We failed to win or push by 5 points in one
game and by 1 point in two games. In two other games our teams combined for 7
turnovers when they both had the turnover advantage going in. 2007 was our 7th
season and it was the first time we did not produce a profit for our customers.
We believe transparency is important in a sports service and we will always show
our record win or lose. If a handicapping service wouldn't, I would think twice
before using them.
In closing the 2007 season we are eager and energized for what is
sure to be another thrilling season of college football in 2008. Here are some
of the top story lines to keep an eye on...
- Will Pete Carroll and the Trojans be able to stay healthy all season? If
they can...look out!
- Can Oklahoma win the Big XII again? If they do will they ever show up
for the bowl game?
- Kansas is loaded, but they go from the hunter to the hunted.
- How long will it take Rich Rodriguez's system to catch on in Michigan?
- Can June Jones turn around SMU?
- Will the Irish rebound and return to the nation's elite?
- Can anyone beat the SEC in the Championship game?
|